I actually didn't look close enough to see the size. I was just going by
what people said at that point. When I was as Accucraft's office I was
told that they had always used a #3 jet. Maybe there was a QA issue with
the old ones?
Trot, the fox who's garbage in, garbage out...
On Tue, 12 Dec 2000, M. Paterson wrote:
> That may be true today. The earlier models had a
> larger orifice. If you remember the one we changed at
> my place had the original jet and the opening appeared
> to be 1.5X the size of the #3 we installed. There has
> been considerable discussion about this change, all
> either neutral or positive when it comes to extending
> run time.
> mike
/\_/\ TrotFox \ Always remember,
( o o ) AKA Landon Solomon \ "There is a
>\./< [EMAIL PROTECTED] \ third alternative."
