Right Tony,

Speed??   However fast you run the Duchess you could never out pace Dick
Moger of G1MRA notoriety!  The fastest I ever saw you run that lovely
Duchess was a scale  395 mph, so Jeff is telling a fib!

Hey, the paint didn't blister again did it?  better  have Aster or OS paint it!

Yours in support,

Geoff.



>Hi Jeff,
>    Now I know why my paint blistered, and your transfers stayed in place!.
>    400mph and I can still keep up with it. What better way to exercise?.
>    Happy Steaming,
>     Regards,
>      Tony D.
>
>At 07:31 PM 3/10/03 -0800, Jeffrey Williams wrote:
>>The difference between the K-27 photos and the Duchess photos is scale:
>>the K-27 was moving at a prototypical 15 mph, whereas the Tony
>>Dixon-piloted Duchess was traveling at a scale (?) 400 mph!
>>
>>===============
>>
>>Anthony Dixon wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi Geoff,
>> >     Just pulling your chain!.
>> >
>> >     LMS Photo's:- With all the focus and speed questions flying around, I
>> > am surprised no-one has asked "why the Slide motion on the Duchess appears
>> > static, while the coupling rods are very blurred". I know one is
>>working in
>> > the horizontal and the other in a circular pattern, and the slide motion
>> > could be at the end of its stroke. But it begs many theories from the
>> > "experts". Whereas on the K27, all appears static!. Either a very fast
>> > shutter speed or a very slow engine! OOPS!.
>> >     (Or the rod bearings on the Duchess have a lot of play).
>> >      TTFN.
>> >      Tony D.
>> >
>> > At 05:12 PM 3/10/03 -0800, Geoff Spenceley wrote:
>> > >Hello,  Tony et al,,
>> > >
>> > >Of course it was "tongue in cheek" and I wanted to see who would lecture
>> > >me.  naturally, you did! As Dave C wrote, if we had a
>> > >"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" in a short time they would be talking about
>> > >wicks!--and we are now discussing those wicks on this group,  which I
>>find
>> > >very interesting (as I did the digital stuff actually!)
>> > >
>> > >Well, thanks for the lecture.  BOO!
>> > >
>> > >  Larry Buerer (who appears once in a while on this group) and myself
>>were
>> > >the digi photographers for our GR Society until our Editour Rick Platz
>> > >acquired a digi camera. Now I always have excuses--how can you run a
>>train
>> > >with a beer glass in one hand and the bloody camera in the other??
>> Tell me!
>> > >No wonder my eyebrows are scorched.
>> > >
>> > >On that, thanks for the lecture, the humour and-I forgot what the other
>> > >was!!--Actuallyt I got very jealous of those LMS photos-- even if they
>> were
>> > >inspirational! All those photos were really great, LMS and all.
>> > >
>> > >Geoff
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >Hi Geoff,
>> > > >     Do I hear a little dry humor in your comments?.
>> > > >     I agree with your concerns about this being a livesteam site, but
>> > > >respectfully suggest that livesteam interests and photograhy do go
>> hand in
>> > > >hand. As without the great photographs supplied by our steaming
>> associates
>> > > >which detail the many steamups, ideas and assembly links, relying on
>> verbal
>> > > >descriptions leaves a lot to the imagination and maybe lead to many
>> > > >incorrect assumptions.
>> > > >     After all a picture is maybe worth a thousand words if in
>>focus, at
>> > > >the correct distance, correct exposure etc. and shows real
>> atmosphere, (and
>> > > >facial wrinkles).
>> > > >     Also, not everyone speaks the Queens English as descriptive and
>> > > >colourful as yourself (and I).!.
>> > > >     i.e. Difficult to describe the outlines and differences between a
>> > > >Britannia, King George vs. Ruby, K27, and a Daylight without a
>> photograph.
>> > > >But you could describe them as "the Best of British vs. the rest", and
>> > > >assume a vivid imagination on the part of the reader!.
>> > > >     Keep smiling, you may be on candid camera, again.
>> > > >     Best Regards,
>> > > >     Tony D.
>> > > >
>> > > >     PS. Take a look at Mike Martins latest photographs taken at Dan,s
>> > > >steamup on 3-1-03
>> > > >at www.panyo.com/steamup and you will see what I mean!.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>


 

Reply via email to