I tried replying offline to your personnal e mail address, but my server cannot find yours as seein "Permenant failure, bad destract in system address".
Could you try sending offline to me instead, and I will try replying back again.
Maybe the Tri-x is polluted with Pixels!.
Thank you,
Tony D.
At 03:31 PM 3/7/03 -0500, FBM Studios wrote:
Hi Tony
Nearly all the professional photographers I know (myself included)
use Epson printers. I have both the 1280 and the 2000 printers. Both
produce prints that will challenge and in the 2000 case beat the quality
of any 35mm negative enlarged to 11X14. The one word of caution is
that digital cameras and computers do not make a good image.
It still requires proper photo ability, photoshop knowledge included.
The same applied to the darkroom.
When buying a digital camera always go for the highest megapixel you can afford.
There is a difference between a 3 and 6 megapixel camera, and ones
expendable dollar amount is also a trade off. I use my equipment to make
a living as a commercial photographer so a 15,000$ digital back (camera not included)
pays for itself very quickly. Having shot solely digitally for the last 5 years I would
not go back to film unless forced.
Back to the printers the 1200 series is 13X19 and the 2000 is archival 13X19 Dollar value the 1200's are great around 500.00US.
Would be happy to answer any questions you have. cheers Ferd.
www.7-8N2.com
Company Web site: www.FBM-Studios.com
