-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 05/19/2010 01:04 AM, David O'Brien wrote: > Recently it was recommended that I not include the LOCAL domain, nested > groups, and related functionality in the end-user doc (limiting it to > the man pages). This raises the following issue: > > There is a section in the draft doc at present, "Using the SSSD > Management Tools", which includes info on working with users, groups, > nested groups, examples, etc., all of which will disappear if we remove > LOCAL domains from the topic list. Is this what we want? I know we're > moving towards the "SSSD functions transparently in the b/g when needed" > approach, but I want to double-check before I remove this section (about > 2 pages). > > Thanks
Right now the local domain plus the management tools are usable primarily for testing, their only benefit is nested groups. I vote for not documenting them in the deployment guide, but leaving the documentation in the SSSD sources (manpages, config file example..) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkvzpnsACgkQHsardTLnvCVTvACdGEo8iBd1whobU/1oVFpeErzn N/cAn3a4pK2lfwmOvp02gtKHGk4GoPOO =b5K2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ sssd-devel mailing list sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel
