On May 19, 2010, at 4:51 AM, Jakub Hrozek <jhro...@redhat.com> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 05/19/2010 01:04 AM, David O'Brien wrote: >> Recently it was recommended that I not include the LOCAL domain, >> nested >> groups, and related functionality in the end-user doc (limiting it to >> the man pages). This raises the following issue: >> >> There is a section in the draft doc at present, "Using the SSSD >> Management Tools", which includes info on working with users, groups, >> nested groups, examples, etc., all of which will disappear if we >> remove >> LOCAL domains from the topic list. Is this what we want? I know we're >> moving towards the "SSSD functions transparently in the b/g when >> needed" >> approach, but I want to double-check before I remove this section >> (about >> 2 pages). >> >> Thanks > > Right now the local domain plus the management tools are usable > primarily for testing, their only benefit is nested groups. > > I vote for not documenting them in the deployment guide, but leaving > the > documentation in the SSSD sources (manpages, config file example..) I agree. _______________________________________________ sssd-devel mailing list sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel
