On 06/25/2010 09:47 AM, Dmitri Pal wrote: > Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> I realized today that the RPM packages for SSSD had the wrong version >> for libini_config. The upstream project revision was 0.4.0, but we >> were building RPMs that claimed it was 0.5.0. To further confuse >> things, in the master branch we actually HAD bumped to 0.5.0 (with a >> soname bump as well). >> >> In order to fix this, I've attached patches to rev the version of >> libini_config in SSSD 1.2 to the version of 0.5.1, and we will rename >> the soname bumped version in master to 0.6.0. >> >> The reason for going with 0.5.1 is to guarantee that upgrades occur >> cleanly (in case someone had inadvertently installed a 0.5.0 package >> from master, which would be incompatible). >> >> >> The attached patches are as follows: >> 0001-Drop-release-requirement-from-versions.patch: >> There's no reason that we should be requiring a specific release >> number for the subpackages, since we always rev the version number >> when interfaces are added. >> >> >> 0002-Bump-libini_config-version-to-0.5.1.patch (sssd-1-2 only): >> Bump the 1.2 branch version to 0.5.1 >> >> 0002-Bump-libini_config-version-to-0.6.0.patch: >> Bump the master branch version to 0.6.0 >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> sssd-devel mailing list >> sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org >> https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel > Visual ack. >
Pushed to master and sssd-1-2 (as appropriate). -- Stephen Gallagher RHCE 804006346421761 Delivering value year after year. Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors. http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/ _______________________________________________ sssd-devel mailing list sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel