On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 02:42:56PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 04:32:20PM +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > > oops, yes I guess this would be a good idea. I'll send a new patch.
> > > 
> > 
> > new version attached.
> > 
> > bye,
> > Sumit
> 
> One last question, do we want to add the ocsp_default_responder and
> ocsp_default_responder_signing_cert options to configAPI?

No, because I think the configAPI is currently not capable of this
because both are only allowed options to certificate_verification as
e.g. no_ocsp or no_verification.

bye,
Sumit
> _______________________________________________
> sssd-devel mailing list
> sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/admin/lists/sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
_______________________________________________
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/admin/lists/sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org

Reply via email to