On (07/06/16 15:13), Jakub Hrozek wrote: >On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 03:11:49PM +0200, Sumit Bose wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 02:42:56PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote: >> > On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 04:32:20PM +0200, Sumit Bose wrote: >> > > > oops, yes I guess this would be a good idea. I'll send a new patch. >> > > > >> > > >> > > new version attached. >> > > >> > > bye, >> > > Sumit >> > >> > One last question, do we want to add the ocsp_default_responder and >> > ocsp_default_responder_signing_cert options to configAPI? >> >> No, because I think the configAPI is currently not capable of this >> because both are only allowed options to certificate_verification as >> e.g. no_ocsp or no_verification. > >OK, makes sense. > >Thank you, ACK. master: * 53ef8f81b60929a6c866efdd133627e7d7d61705 * aa35995ef056aa8ae052a47c62c6750b7adf065e * 875c90d531e6869a92da4b515db729ffce7c4244
LS _______________________________________________ sssd-devel mailing list sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/admin/lists/sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
