On (27/07/16 15:57), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 04:11:16PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> On (25/07/16 13:10), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>> >On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 03:14:17PM +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >> 
>> >> it is possible that the CLAP/netlogon reply does not contain any site
>> >> data. In this case we should not fail but just use what we can get.
>> >> Especially when looking up the Global Catalog the forest name is needed.
>> >> If the site name is missing we still can use the forest name to lookup
>> >> the Global Catalog in DNS.
>> >> 
>> >> The first patch is not strictly related to the issue but since it fixes
>> >> a potential memory leak (we currently do not have it because only
>> >> short-lived memory contexts are used so far) I think it is worth adding
>> >> it here.
>> >> 
>> >> bye,
>> >> Sumit
>> >> 
>> >
>> >> From a0cf3c4b04069a71a0d610e1164390ec8bab45ab Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> >> From: Sumit Bose <sb...@redhat.com>
>> >> Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 13:16:43 +0200
>> >> Subject: [PATCH 1/4] AD: avoid memory leak in netlogon_get_domain_info() 
>> >> and
>> >>  make it public
>> >
>> >ACK
>> >
>> >> From 56f0b52cc91580f2ee9216f16d809c3da866728d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> >> From: Sumit Bose <sb...@redhat.com>
>> >> Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 13:29:33 +0200
>> >> Subject: [PATCH 2/4] AD: netlogon_get_domain_info() allow missing 
>> >> arguments
>> >>  and empty results
>> >
>> >ACK
>> >
>> >> From 0e4564b85f632adedd1129d6b8b200db2a7a87ee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> >> From: Sumit Bose <sb...@redhat.com>
>> >> Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 17:05:29 +0200
>> >> Subject: [PATCH 3/4] tests: add tests for netlogon_get_domain_info
>> >
>> >ACK
>> >
>> >
>> >> From 4b6b33eb18a3d9c40c26503a9c7b8ae80d998e15 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> >> From: Sumit Bose <sb...@redhat.com>
>> >> Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 11:25:47 +0200
>> >> Subject: [PATCH 4/4] AD: replace ad_get_client_site_parse_ndr() with
>> >>  netlogon_get_domain_info()
>> >
>> >ACK
>> >
>> >I tested site resolution and basic lookups manually and everything seems
>> >to be working.
>> >
>> >Coverity didn't report anything either. I will push this patch set once
>> >the CI run finishes.
>> 
>> http://sssd-ci.duckdns.org/logs/job/50/12/summary.html
>> 
>> master:
>> * 3000d86bea2bae735175f93b0e013bbcb3979f1e
>> * 7fe7073ad2c84946a699528a3bb79f7803c96b69
>> * 44656ce260030556820c4b6be519e66ffdacb408
>> * 74bef2150c76c8814bf4c1654ecd3660604eb4e6
>
>Is anyone against pushing this patch to sssd-1-13 as well?
Go ahead.

LS
_______________________________________________
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/admin/lists/sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org

Reply via email to