On (12/08/16 07:39), Stephen Gallagher wrote: >On 08/12/2016 07:30 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: >> On (12/08/16 13:24), Jakub Hrozek wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> a simple one-liner is attached. >> >>>From c7bd0b7e695d031258ab47d8c425c9d5843d4069 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >>> From: Jakub Hrozek <jhro...@redhat.com> >>> Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 13:23:16 +0200 >>> Subject: [PATCH] CONFIG: full_name_format is an allowed option for all >>> domains >>> >>> --- >>> src/config/cfg_rules.ini | 1 + >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/src/config/cfg_rules.ini b/src/config/cfg_rules.ini >>> index >>> 09f53fa41eb2904f11a78af333b6d79619d2759c..febe4289832f3778b7e974ef4e8b3f6d9d8bffd8 >>> 100644 >>> --- a/src/config/cfg_rules.ini >>> +++ b/src/config/cfg_rules.ini >>> @@ -287,6 +287,7 @@ option = subdomain_refresh_interval >>> option = subdomain_inherit >>> option = cached_auth_timeout >>> option = wildcard_limit >>> +option = full_name_format >>> >>> #Entry cache timeouts >>> option = entry_cache_user_timeout >> >> Could you also update src/config/etc/sssd.api.* ? >> > >Which will probably mean updating the SSSDConfigTest also. > I though it was implicit, becasue we reject patches which do not pass unit+integration tests :-)
LS _______________________________________________ sssd-devel mailing list sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/admin/lists/sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
