URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/183
Title: #183: More socket-activation fixes

lslebodn commented:
"""
On (10/03/17 05:50), fidencio wrote:
>@sgallah, @lslebodn
>
>On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 2:22 PM, Stephen Gallagher <notificati...@github.com
>> wrote:
>
>> @lslebodn <https://github.com/lslebodn>
>>
>> @sgallagher <https://github.com/sgallagher> The purpose of calling chown
>> in ExecStartPre is to allow starting responders as non-privileged from
>> beginning. Systemd drops permissions before exec.
>>
>> Yeah, I get that. And I told @fidencio <https://github.com/fidencio> on
>> IRC that we can live with the TOCTOU for the time being and figure out a
>> better option later. That said, we cannot use /usr/bin/chown for this,
>> because it unconditionally calls getpwnam()/getpwuid() in its execution,
>> which causes a problem when socket-activating. I suggested that we might
>> want to just create a reduced-functionality /usr/libexec/sssd/sss_chown
>> that calls only the low-level system function.
>>
>
>Well, considering we write our own sss_chown binary ... as we still don't
>have a static uid for the sssd user we would end up calling
>getpwnam()/getpwuid() for the unprivileged user.
>
we can call "getpwnam()/getpwuid()" in responders except
sssd-nss (and monitor).

In monitor we should set/unset env variable `_SSS_LOOPS`

>In other others, it would solve the situation but only for the NSS
>responder.
>
Is there any problem to start other responders after sssd-nss?

>What I'm proposing is to take a step back and do *not* support unprivileged
>users for socket-activated services for now. Get the socket-activation
>working without cycle dependency on SSSD and avoid the TUCTOU issue.
>
>Once we have the static uid for the sssd user on Fedora then I can start
>bugging Debian/Ubuntu/openSUSE/SUSE maintainers in order to provide the
>same and we get back to supporting the unprivileged user for
>socket-activated services.
>
static uid/gid is not a solution; it's just a workaround.

LS

"""

See the full comment at 
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/183#issuecomment-285722632
_______________________________________________
sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org

Reply via email to