On (21/09/17 13:33), Jakub Hrozek wrote: >On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 01:30:17PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: >> On (21/09/17 13:22), Jakub Hrozek wrote: >> >clients. But I thought krb5.conf should also contain only the local >> >master..does the config file in the issue you saw contain something >> >else? >> > >> >I mean, if we revert the patch and krb5.conf contains no records or multiple >> >records, then I think the libkrb5 configuration is broken and we are relying >> >on sssd injecting a valid value into an otherwise invalid krb5 >> >configuration. >> > >> >> I'm waiting for machine to see content of krb5.conf and then I'll check >> Sumit's assumption. > >I also wonder if the bug might be in IPv4/IPv6 resolution. Because IIRC >libc prefers IPv6 addresses during resulution, but SSSD prefers IPv4 and >the kdcinfo file would contain a v4 address. > >But then I guess reverting the patch and injecting the kdcinfo file >would help.. If it's a bug in krb5-libs then we should fix it (because it can cause intermittent failures in other tests); * reverting the patch might be a temporary workaround.
LS _______________________________________________ sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org
