On (21/09/17 13:33), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 01:30:17PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> On (21/09/17 13:22), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>> >clients. But I thought krb5.conf should also contain only the local
>> >master..does the config file in the issue you saw contain something
>> >else?
>> >
>> >I mean, if we revert the patch and krb5.conf contains no records or multiple
>> >records, then I think the libkrb5 configuration is broken and we are relying
>> >on sssd injecting a valid value into an otherwise invalid krb5 
>> >configuration.
>> >
>> 
>> I'm waiting for machine to see content of krb5.conf and then I'll check
>> Sumit's assumption.
>
>I also wonder if the bug might be in IPv4/IPv6 resolution. Because IIRC
>libc prefers IPv6 addresses during resulution, but SSSD prefers IPv4 and
>the kdcinfo file would contain a v4 address.
>
>But then I guess reverting the patch and injecting the kdcinfo file
>would help..
If it's a bug in krb5-libs then we should fix it (because it can cause
intermittent failures in other tests);
* reverting the patch might be a temporary workaround.

LS
_______________________________________________
sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org

Reply via email to