On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 04:14:27PM +0800, DDD wrote:
> Greg KH wrote:
> >On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 09:57:22AM +0800, DDD wrote:
> >>Frank Pan wrote:
> >>>>What is the commit id you are refering to?  Also, if you could provide
> >>>>the backport, that you have tested to work properly, that would be best.
> >>>The commit id is:
> >>>fb82c0ff27b2c40c6f7a3d1a94cafb154591fa80
> >>>
> >>>I've tested this on the xen pv-ops 2.6.32-next branch. It works fine.
> >>>If this is not enough, I can test that on the vanilla 2.6.32.y branch.
> >>Yep, That patch is simple and easy to backport to 2.6.32, Just need
> >>to patch it on kernel/kgdb.c instead of kernel/debug/gdbstub.c as
> >>Frank said. But it is better to test your patch on vanilla 2.6.32.y
> >>branch. :-)
> >
> >Someone needs to provide me with the tested and backported patch before
> >I can apply it.
> 
> Done.
> 
> Could you apply the attachment patch which was based on 2.6.32.y to
> stable tree?
> 
> Or I need to use git-sendmail to send a independent patch mail to you?

That's good enough, give me a week or so to queue it up.

thanks,

greg k-h

_______________________________________________
stable mailing list
[email protected]
http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/stable

Reply via email to