On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 07:17:05AM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 04:14:27PM +0800, DDD wrote: > > Greg KH wrote: > > >On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 09:57:22AM +0800, DDD wrote: > > >>Frank Pan wrote: > > >>>>What is the commit id you are refering to? Also, if you could provide > > >>>>the backport, that you have tested to work properly, that would be best. > > >>>The commit id is: > > >>>fb82c0ff27b2c40c6f7a3d1a94cafb154591fa80 > > >>> > > >>>I've tested this on the xen pv-ops 2.6.32-next branch. It works fine. > > >>>If this is not enough, I can test that on the vanilla 2.6.32.y branch. > > >>Yep, That patch is simple and easy to backport to 2.6.32, Just need > > >>to patch it on kernel/kgdb.c instead of kernel/debug/gdbstub.c as > > >>Frank said. But it is better to test your patch on vanilla 2.6.32.y > > >>branch. :-) > > > > > >Someone needs to provide me with the tested and backported patch before > > >I can apply it. > > > > Done. > > > > Could you apply the attachment patch which was based on 2.6.32.y to > > stable tree? > > > > Or I need to use git-sendmail to send a independent patch mail to you? > > That's good enough, give me a week or so to queue it up.
Now applied. greg k-h _______________________________________________ stable mailing list [email protected] http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/stable
