Le jeudi 26 mai 2011 à 12:47 -0500, Dan Williams a écrit :
> It's current exposed only through /proc which besides requiring
> screen-scraping doesn't allow userspace to distinguish between two
> identical ATM adapters with different ATM indexes. The ATM device index
> is required when using PPPoATM on a system with multiple ATM adapters.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <[email protected]>
> ---
>
> PS: -> stable too since it's a minimal change with no backwards
> incompatibility and I'd like to rely on this attribute in NetworkManager
>
> diff --git a/net/atm/atm_sysfs.c b/net/atm/atm_sysfs.c
> index f7fa67c..e5edbde 100644
> --- a/net/atm/atm_sysfs.c
> +++ b/net/atm/atm_sysfs.c
> @@ -59,6 +59,16 @@ static ssize_t show_atmaddress(struct device *cdev,
> return pos - buf;
> }
>
> +static ssize_t show_atmindex(struct device *cdev,
> + struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> +{
> + char *pos = buf;
> + struct atm_dev *adev = to_atm_dev(cdev);
> +
> + pos += sprintf(pos, "%d\n", adev->number);
> + return pos - buf;
> +}
> +
What about :
{
struct atm_dev *adev = to_atm_dev(cdev);
return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", adev->number);
}
_______________________________________________
stable mailing list
[email protected]
http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/stable
