On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 12:34:20PM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote: > On 09/25/2014, 06:52 PM, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > > From: Julian Anastasov <[email protected]> > > > > [ upstream commit 2627b7e15c5064ddd5e578e4efd948d48d531a3f ] > > > > commit 8f4e0a18682d91 ("IPVS netns exit causes crash in conntrack") > > added second ip_vs_conn_drop_conntrack call instead of just adding > > the needed check. As result, the first call still can cause > > crash on netns exit. Remove it. > > > > Cc: <[email protected]> # 3.14.x > > Cc: <[email protected]> # 3.12.x > > Thanks! Do I understand correctly (from the annotations), that 3.12 > needs only: > 1/6 ipvs: avoid netns exit crash on ip_vs_conn_drop_conntrack > 3/6 ipvs: Maintain all DSCP and ECN bits for ipv6 tun forwarding > 5/6 ipvs: fix ipv6 hook registration for local replies > ?
Yes. All patches that contain: Cc: <[email protected]> # 3.12.x apply cleanly (according to my scripts) to 3.12 and I'll be happy if you take them. >From this question, I suspect I misinterpreted Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt. I can include this in subject if you prefer so, but I will have to send the same patch several times for each -stable kernel this needs to be applied. Please, clarify so I can do better -stable submissions. Thanks! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
