On 09/26/2014, 12:50 PM, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 12:34:20PM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote: >> On 09/25/2014, 06:52 PM, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: >>> From: Julian Anastasov <[email protected]> >>> >>> [ upstream commit 2627b7e15c5064ddd5e578e4efd948d48d531a3f ] >>> >>> commit 8f4e0a18682d91 ("IPVS netns exit causes crash in conntrack") >>> added second ip_vs_conn_drop_conntrack call instead of just adding >>> the needed check. As result, the first call still can cause >>> crash on netns exit. Remove it. >>> >>> Cc: <[email protected]> # 3.14.x >>> Cc: <[email protected]> # 3.12.x >> >> Thanks! Do I understand correctly (from the annotations), that 3.12 >> needs only: >> 1/6 ipvs: avoid netns exit crash on ip_vs_conn_drop_conntrack >> 3/6 ipvs: Maintain all DSCP and ECN bits for ipv6 tun forwarding >> 5/6 ipvs: fix ipv6 hook registration for local replies >> ? > > Yes. All patches that contain: > > Cc: <[email protected]> # 3.12.x > > apply cleanly (according to my scripts) to 3.12 and I'll be happy if > you take them. > > From this question, I suspect I misinterpreted > Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt. > > I can include this in subject if you prefer so, but I will have to > send the same patch several times for each -stable kernel this needs > to be applied.
The way you send them is fine. I just wanted to be sure. thanks, -- js suse labs -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
