LGPL should not appear in DEPENDENCIES-BY-LICENSE for dual-licensed dependencies
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                 Key: STANBOL-548
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-548
             Project: Stanbol
          Issue Type: Bug
            Reporter: Bertrand Delacretaz
            Assignee: Bertrand Delacretaz
            Priority: Minor


Stanbol 0.9.0-incubating RC4 contains

GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL), Version 2.1 :
 * JAX-RS provider for JSON content type 
(org.codehaus.jackson:jackson-jaxrs:1.7.1 - http://jackson.codehaus.org)
 * Xml Compatibility extensions for Jackson 
(org.codehaus.jackson:jackson-xc:1.7.1 - http://jackson.codehaus.org)

but according to http://wiki.fasterxml.com/JacksonDownload those dependencies 
are dual-licensed AL and LGPL. In this case we choose the Apache License 
obviously, so it would be better if we can omit listing those as LGPL to 
prevent confusion.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to