[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-548?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bertrand Delacretaz resolved STANBOL-548.
-----------------------------------------
Resolution: Won't Fix
I didn't find a way in http://mojo.codehaus.org/license-maven-plugin/ to take
only one license into account for dual-licensed dependencies.
I suggest leaving this as is, at least we have this issue to document this
minor problem.
> LGPL should not appear in DEPENDENCIES-BY-LICENSE for dual-licensed
> dependencies
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: STANBOL-548
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-548
> Project: Stanbol
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 0.9.0-incubating
> Reporter: Bertrand Delacretaz
> Assignee: Bertrand Delacretaz
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 0.9.0-incubating
>
>
> Stanbol 0.9.0-incubating RC4 contains
> GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL), Version 2.1 :
> * JAX-RS provider for JSON content type
> (org.codehaus.jackson:jackson-jaxrs:1.7.1 - http://jackson.codehaus.org)
> * Xml Compatibility extensions for Jackson
> (org.codehaus.jackson:jackson-xc:1.7.1 - http://jackson.codehaus.org)
> but according to http://wiki.fasterxml.com/JacksonDownload those dependencies
> are dual-licensed AL and LGPL. In this case we choose the Apache License
> obviously, so it would be better if we can omit listing those as LGPL to
> prevent confusion.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
