On 12 July 2011 07:23, Fabian Christ <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > yes I have no problem to release the "Full Launcher" if that's more desired. I would prefer that way, there are modules which became stable recently, and need to be checked, tested and especially **used** to get them improved. I think that the minimal requirement could be that they must be stable (at compile time) and have a documented functionality (at runtime). Then, if the functionality is limited to some extend, or does not work 100% as expected, the release will help developer's to find bugs or opportunities of improvements (and motivation to do that, also)
Best Enrico > > I will open JIRA issues for the release today, so that we can collect > all the required information. > > Best, > - Fabian > > 2011/7/12 Andreas Kuckartz <[email protected]>: >> I do think that components which are not yet "stable" should also be >> included in the release if possible ("Release early - release often"). >> Minimum technical requirement: Maven must be able to build them! >> >> Release notes should explain the status of the components so that nobody >> is surprised when unstable components do not work as expected. >> >> Cheers, >> Andreas >> >> >> Am 11.07.2011 14:47, schrieb Fabian Christ: >>> Hi, >>> >>> the IKS project would like to do a release around August 22, 2011. >>> Since the IKS project is based on Stanbol it would be nice to have an >>> official Stanbol release at the same time. >>> >>> Proposal: Release Stanbol 0.9 at August 22, 2011 >>> >>> I think we should use the Stanbol "stable" launcher as a reference for >>> this release. Everything included in this launcher would be part of >>> the release. >>> >>> WDYT? >>> >>> Best, >> > > > > -- > Fabian > -- Enrico Daga -- http://www.enridaga.net skype: enri-pan
