Mridul Muralidharan wrote:
> 
> More important than the limits, imo, would be the error to be conveyed
> to the client in case it set's a roster item which violates the server
> policies on size.
> This could potentially be reused in other places as well ... is
> not-acceptable descriptive enough for this ?

I think so.

> If we specify this, then rest is just an implementation detail imo with
> a recommendation to clients/servers to support atleast so many characters.

If it is SHOULD NOT be more than XXXX characters then certainly a server
could accept something longer.

/psa

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to