Richard Dobson wrote: > One thing I was thinking of along these lines would be rather than set > the sizes in this way regarding how clients would interact with the > server, have a implementation guide for server developers to the > recommended sizing for certain fields, not sure if the place for that > would be in the RFC but it would help developers by letting them > immediately see how they will need to likely size their databases > without having to go out and look at other existing XMPP software to try > and determine what others are doing first, just a thought.
Well, we've always needed an implementation guide. Probably one for server developers and another for client developers. IMHO that would be a great project for a few people to work on (perhaps after the next set of RFCs is published, or concurrent with the RFC process). I don't think all those implementation details belong in the RFCs, however. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
