Thomas Charron wrote: > On 9/27/07, Kevin Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On 27 Sep 2007, at 14:30, Thomas Charron wrote: >>> Interesting.. It would seem that REX is the general purpose XML >>> manipulation that was talked about when the whiteboarding was rejected >>> by the council because they wished a more general purpose solution... >> It may be worth reading the recent discussions on this, where REX was >> discussed. In short: it may be patent-encumbered, so we can't use it. >> /K > > Bah. I looked back and I remember now.
The patent issues were serious enough that the W3C stopped its work on REX. > How a patent could be granted on basically transmitting an XPath > query string is really beyond me. Me too. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
