Pedro Melo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> I think that 157 breaks the current disco#info usage pattern. We use
> disco#info to discover which protocols an entity supports, not the
> get the information directly (exception for basic  <identity >). So
> receiving the entire contact information in the disco#info reply
> seems wrong, because on most requests, we don't need it.

That could be fixed by using a special node for the contact info
request, couldn't it?

-- 
Magnus
JID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to