Dnia 2008-03-30, nie o godzinie 20:53 -0700, anders conbere pisze: > Right now I'm struggling to find an number of > clients that let me keep users in multiple groups, or at least give > me ui to group in a tagging like behavior.
Gajim does support contacts in multiple groups for the very long time now. And it's group assigning interface works just like tagging interfaces seen in the wild. > That in and of itself might seem to be reason at least to create a new > semantic grouping. -1 The fact that that our roster "tags" are called "group" does not justify creating yet another standard. This is a client interface implementation issue. -- /\_./o__ Tomasz Sterna (/^/(_^^' http://www.xiaoka.com/ ._.(_.)_ im:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
