On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 15:47:17 -0600 Peter Saint-Andre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Pavel Simerda wrote: > > On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 08:55:28 -0600 > > Peter Saint-Andre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Pavel Simerda wrote: > >>> But then what is an invitation for? You have to make someone a > >>> member and send him an invitation message. But for this, you have > >>> to be able to add members. > >> I don't think the concept of an invitation-only room makes much > >> sense, especially because we don't have ways of delivering secure > >> invitations (right now invitations are more social interactions, > >> not technical interactions, and I think we might want to leave it > >> that way). > > > > But i thought I've seen some members-only rooms. > > Oh sure, one example is [EMAIL PROTECTED] :) > > /psa But that means we have some sort of room authorization :). And we should know what happens if you invite someone to a room that's members-only and he's not a member. Because just sending a direct invite is no good. Making him a member and sending a direct invite seems natural to me. Pavel -- Web: http://www.pavlix.net/ Jabber & Mail: pavlix(at)pavlix.net OpenID: pavlix.net
