This looks ugly and unnecessary to me. On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 16:01:54 +0200 Jonathan Schleifer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am 20.08.2008 um 01:01 schrieb Peter Saint-Andre: > > > <message > > from='[EMAIL PROTECTED]/desktop' > > to='[EMAIL PROTECTED]'> > > <x xmlns='http://jabber.org/protocol/muc#user'> > > <invite to='[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > > id='some-long-id-here'/> > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > </x> > > </message> > > How about this instead? > > <message from='[EMAIL PROTECTED]/desktop' > to='[EMAIL PROTECTED]'> > <x xmlns='http://jabber.org/protocol/muc#user'> > <invite to='[EMAIL PROTECTED]'> > <id>some_id (doesn't even need to be long)</id> > </invite> > </x> > </message> > > Are you sure current implementations will not route that? > For the clients, it doesn't matter if they ignore it, because that > means they only support mediated invitations and not direct > invitations. Only new clients will implement directed invitiations, > and if we make the ID a part of that, they will implement it. > > -- > Jonathan -- Web: http://www.pavlix.net/ Jabber & Mail: pavlix(at)pavlix.net OpenID: pavlix.net
