On Tue, 7 Oct 2008 13:09:07 +0100 Pedro Melo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, > > On Oct 7, 2008, at 12:13 PM, Pavel Simerda wrote: > > On Mon, 6 Oct 2008 16:35:03 +0100 > > Pedro Melo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Oct 6, 2008, at 3:43 PM, Jonathan Schleifer wrote: > >> > >>> Am 06.10.2008 um 13:30 schrieb Pedro Melo: > >>> > >>>> IMHO, you should use caps for that. > >>>> > >>>> That's the proper way to solve it. Use an identity client/phone > >>>> or client/handheld. > >>> > >>> > >>> Doesn't solve the issue with you are connected via laptop and > >>> desktop at home and are online using GPRS on the laptop (I already > >>> gave this example before, so I won't give it again - read the old > >>> messages for the full example). > >> > >> See my previous messages: caps, disco, and disco identities, with > >> the name attribute, solve all your current problems. > >> > >> And in a standard, document, way, not subject to I8N > >> interpretations. > >> > >> Best regards, > > > > +1 > > > > Thanks for pointing out the right solution for this particular > > case... but I don't see home/work and other info there. > > Sure, that would be the name attribute value. > > Because home, work, et al is the name you choose to give to those > instances. > > Best regards, Thanks I got it while reading other posts. Your patience will be remembered :). Pavel -- Pavel Šimerda Freelancer v oblasti počítačových sítí, komunikace a bezpečnosti Web: http://www.pavlix.net/ Jabber & Mail: pavlix(at)pavlix.net OpenID: pavlix.net
