-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 4/28/09 6:25 AM, Florian Zeitz wrote: > Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >> On 4/25/09 4:01 PM, JiYí Zárevúcký wrote: >>> "Upon receiving notice that a data packet is cannot be processed by >>> the recipient, the sender SHOULD consider the bytestream to be closed >>> and invalid but MAY attempt to correct the error and re-send the >>> offending data packet using the same sequence number (the recipient >>> MUST NOT consider a sequence number to have been used until the data >>> packet has been successfully processed)." >>> The sender must either resend data or explicitly close the stream by >>> sending the "close" query. Otherwise the recipient doesn't know >>> whether the sender wants to resend or not. Right? >> That is my understanding. > > In that case I would suggest changing the text a bit for clarity. > IMHO "consider the bytestream to be closed" != "should close the bytestream"
Yes, I will clean up the text. I'm currently reviewing XEP-0065 (SOCKS5 Bytestreams), too, as well as the related Jingle specs, so I'll work on them all at once. Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkn3A8oACgkQNL8k5A2w/vx6NwCg66JdE40sXOWZ04PZqnIhErGn akAAn2fRclpk/sgFwj4I4/kXTDBRMAH1 =4wx6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
