On 7/14/09 8:59 PM, "Peter Saint-Andre" <stpe...@stpeter.im> wrote: >> Could we just do a new urn:xmpp:roster namespace, expose your master roster >> via that namespace (also), and use that new namespace to talk to external >> entities? > > Or we could use jabber:iq:roster as we always have in the past, with > urn:xmpp:roster for the share groups functionality.
Sure, that would work, as long as the two schemas were fundamentally equal aside from namespace. If there was a single namespace with a backwards-compatibility mode, it would give us a chance to define an extensibility model, however. -- Joe Hildebrand
