Jiří Zárevúcky <zarevucky.j...@gmail.com> wrote: > It's possible I guess, but creating a new roster protocol could have > another advantages. > > For example, the current one doesn't communicate the full state. For > pending-in, you have to listen for presences and client even has to > guess the state sometimes. > > The presence subscription handling using presence stanzas is another > thing I always considered quite weird.
A new roster proto could also include the presences of the contacts so you don't get thousands of presences, but get them with the roster. -- Jonathan
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
