-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 7/27/09 12:07 PM, Kurt Zeilenga wrote: > > On Jul 27, 2009, at 10:29 AM, Dave Cridland wrote: > >> On Mon Jul 27 18:00:28 2009, Kurt Zeilenga wrote: >>> But another way to simply respond to your comment is to note that >>> the JID X is not being authoritative for Y, it's being authoritative >>> for what its willing to allow in the context of Y. >> >> I'd note for the record that even this is not accurate... Jid X is >> merely providing a catalogue of labels which it feels may be useful >> for communications with Jid Y. There may be other labels which it will >> allow, and the catalogue may include labels which it won't allow. > > Right. I should have said "... it's making a suggestion about what > labels the client might use in messages to Y". > > I note that I've updated xep-0258.xml in the SVN repository in attempt > to address recent list comments. I defer asking Peter to publish a > revision for a few days to allow folks to comment as to whether or not > the updates adequately address the comments.
I think they are fine but I need to give the spec a more thorough review one of these days... Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkpzqnYACgkQNL8k5A2w/vzHJQCgpR2KY9cSa39LwDjW4C61mLKl CW4AnRBMMr6Wh7sffAgObIDUlRrYtDZ/ =NTu1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
