On Wed Jan 12 20:26:52 2011, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
That seems mostly reasonable to me. I see a possible edge case if
the
reconnecion address (ip:port or host:port or whatever) isn't
actually
there by the time the initiating entity tries to reconnect, i.e.,
the
server tells me the reconnection address and a few days later when
my
session dies I finally try to reconnect but the address that the
server
*thought* was going to work a few days ago isn't so much alive
anymore.
Do we need to worry about that? If so, does the initiating entity
just
follow the rules from 3920bis regarding the connection process?
(See for
instance the rules for <see-other-host/> in 3920bis...)
If it's a case of "This is the place you should reconnect to first"
that seems reasonable - so if it fails, move onto standard 3920
sleection.
Dave.
--
Dave Cridland - mailto:[email protected] - xmpp:[email protected]
- acap://acap.dave.cridland.net/byowner/user/dwd/bookmarks/
- http://dave.cridland.net/
Infotrope Polymer - ACAP, IMAP, ESMTP, and Lemonade
