On 2/12/11 5:09 AM, Remko Tronçon wrote: > Hi Ben, > >> I think using RFC3986 (2732) formatting rules for supporting IPv6 >> address/port in a single attribute would be fine. Any software that intends >> to communicate over IPv6 is probably going to need to understand that format >> at some point. > > Well, we haven't needed it so far, and this XEP would be the first > time we do, but I may be missing something. That's why I'm also in > favor of splitting it into a separate attribute.
"It" = IPv6? We might need it soon. ;-) In any case, splitting the host/IP and port into separate attributes is fine with me. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
