Hi, On Tuesday 26 April 2011 13:54:51 XMPP Extensions Editor wrote: > Version 0.3 of XEP-0277 (Microblogging over XMPP) has been released.
Regarding comment nodes: is it expected that every set of comments for a post or attachment has its own node? By that I mean you would not have two different posts advertising the same comments node (at least not unless you were doing it on purpose and understood the implications). How would replies to comments be handled? Would a reply advertise another comments node to contain replies just to that comment itself? Or would all replies (nested or not) for a top-level post or attachment be contained within the same node using appropriate in-reply-to referencing? The text says that the node for comments should be "urn:xmpp:microblog:0:comments:hash" where "hash" is a client-side generated random hash. This could use more explanation. I wonder if it is really necessary to use this naming format or client side generated hash at all? If the goal is node uniqueness among those offered by the pubsub jid, and the client is the one initiating the creation of the comments node, then shouldn't it be enough to use instant nodes (xep-60 terminology) ? -Justin
