On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Mark Rejhon <marky...@gmail.com> wrote: > Re: http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/realtimetext.html > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Kurt Zeilenga <kurt.zeile...@isode.com> > wrote: >> >> I am quite concerned that the current spec offers zero negotiation of the >> extension before its use. >> I urge the authors to add some negotiation, preferable before it's >> published as XEP. > > I agree, we are going to be developing a session negotiation mechanism over > time:
I think a sensible baseline, as I noted in the other thread (to which I need to reply again) is using caps to signal support. This at least does away with the most terrible "Doesn't support it, but gets spammed anyway" case. /K
