On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 6:44 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <stpe...@stpeter.im> wrote: >> What I was implying was, most deployed software is not following the >> 'message-with-subject-but-no-body' rule, and is following the >> 'message-with-subject-is-a-subject' rule. Making the latter wrong and >> the former right is going to make most deployed software >> non-compliant. > > I think we might need to have a longer discussion about this, or a call for > consensus.
On the other hand, making message-with-body an acceptable way of changing the subject is going to make existing compliant software non-compliant. I'd have thought that was bad (this doesn't just apply to servers - clients also need to know what a subject change is). /K
