On Sep 26, 2011, at 11:09 PM, Kevin Smith wrote: >> I think one ought to allow for extension elements in the subject change >> message. For instance, say the subject change message is delayed at an >> occupant's server, which hence adds a <delay/> element. Hence, I think it >> should be a <subject/> child with a <body/>.
whoops. s/with/without/ here. > > I don't mind if it has other children than <subject/>, but existing > implementations require there to be no <body/> on a subject change, > and I see no reason to break them at this stage. yes. -- Kurt
