Hi Peter, Many thanks for your swift action. We will be contributing an XEP-0009 implementation to SleekXMPP (Python) , so being compliant with the standard, and therefore having an implementation that is interoperable, is very valuable for us.
With kind regards, Gerard Maas. On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 12:08 AM, Peter Saint-Andre <stpe...@stpeter.im>wrote: > On 10/5/11 10:24 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > > On 10/5/11 9:07 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > >> On 10/5/11 1:20 AM, Gerard Maas wrote: > >>> Hi Peter, > >>> > >>> Thanks for the follow-up. > >>> > >>> Could you give me an idea about the timeline of such a revision? Are we > >>> talking days/weeks/months? > >> > >> Hours? :) > >> > >> The XMPP Council will discuss the matter in its meeting today, which > >> just started. > > > > See here: > > > > http://xmpp.org:5290/muc_log/muc.xmpp.org/council/111005/#15:32:53 > > > > and here: > > > > http://xmpp.org:5290/muc_log/muc.xmpp.org/council/111005/#15:46:16 > > > > SleekXMPP appears to have <Base64> but in the chatroom Lance Stout said > > he could fix that. > > > > I am inclined to view <Base64> as a typo in the (unofficial) schema that > > we borrowed from Elliotte Rusty Harold's book, and inclined to correct > > the schema with a prominent note in the text about earlier versions of > > the spec showing <Base64> instead of <base64>. > > I've provisionally updated the spec: > > http://xmpp.org/extensions/tmp/xep-0009-2.2.html > > http://xmpp.org/extensions/diff/api/xep/0009/diff/2.1/vs/2.2rc1 > > I expect that the XMPP Council will consider these changes at its next > meeting. > > Peter > > -- > Peter Saint-Andre > https://stpeter.im/ > > >
