On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 5:15 PM, Kurt Zeilenga <kurt.zeile...@isode.com> wrote: > Why is this restriction restricted to editing the "last" stanza sent? > > Is this due to presentation issues? > > If so, I think the clients are going to have to deal with them no matter what > restrictions we place on senders... because a sender cannot control other > senders. In short, receiving clients have to appropriately deal with > replacements for non-last stanzas. And as clients are certainly going to > have to deal with this MUC, seems no big deal for them to deal with it > general. > > Anyways, if there's no particularly strong reason to have the "last" message > restriction, I think it should be removed.
The spec originally allowed previous non-last correction, and the community cried foul so I removed it. I can add it back in if the community has now changed its mind! /K
