On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Philipp Hancke <fi...@goodadvice.pages.de> wrote: > Am 13.08.2012 19:06, schrieb Kurt Zeilenga: >> >> I rather the client simply add the replacement message to the message >> stream (as it would any other new message) and provide me some indication >> that it's a replacement for another message and what that message is. > > I like that notion. It doesn't change the 'oh, I meant to say...' model that > is (probably) widely used today, but still gives a hint which message is > affected.
Agreed -- I suggest Kevin make a mention suggesting such behavior. Note, <replace/> has no better/worse potential for amplification attacks than XEP-0301 does (assuming you follow reasonable rules, such as automatically transmit traffic when receiving traffic, etc -- neither of which is required for 0301 or 0308)
