Hi, On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Andreas Kuckartz <a.kucka...@ping.de> wrote: > According to http://xmpp.org/about-xmpp/xsf/xmpp-council/ ralphm is > currently a member of the XMPP Council. > > Can someone please let me know if he has a veto right there?
Yes - the process is described in http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0001.html#approval; any Council member can prevent advancement of a XEP indefinitely (whether this is a good idea is up for debate, but that's the way it is). > If that is the case there would be no reason for me to spend a minute > more on finding a reasonable way to add RDFa to XEP-0071. I generally do > not participate in discussions with a predetermined outcome. Council members have been known to change their minds, but in this case I think a significant change in scope/purpsoe of a Draft XEP immediately before advancement to Final might be a bit extreme. This doesn't, however, prevent proposal of a new XEP implementing RDFa, which would seem a sensible route to take here. /K
