Hi all, I was actually wondering myself about the status of XMPP & SIP usage for sensors. I dropped Peter a mail a month ago to hear more about the deployment situation. It seems that if there are implementations then they are using HTTP.
Ciao Hannes On Dec 17, 2012, at 5:47 PM, Matthew Wild wrote: > On 17 December 2012 12:35, Peter Waher <peter.wa...@clayster.com> wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> I’m writing to you to, to ask about the status of the following document: >> >> http://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/sensors.html >> > >> I’m interested in developing extensions for allowing sensor data >> communication and IoT, among other things. We have multiple applications >> using XMPP and sensors. Before proposing an extension by ourselves, I’ve >> been waiting to find colleagues working in the same area, so we could >> propose an extension together, this increasing the probability for it to >> become useful. >> >> What is the status of the above mentioned document? Is it set in stone, or >> is it possible to work on it, redefine parts of it, etc., in order for it to >> become more general and suitable also to our needs? Are you able to invite >> other authors to partake in the development of this proposed extension? > > It was rejected by the council at its meeting 2011-04-27: > http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/council/2011-May/003164.html > > Nathan posted his reasoning here: > http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2011-May/024545.html - and > the discussion continued here: > http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2011-May/024547.html > > No new version was submitted as far as I know, and I know of no public > implementations of the protocol (that's not to say there aren't any of > course...). > > Regards, > Matthew
