On 2013-02-24 17:20, Kevin Smith wrote:
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 6:46 AM, Gunnar Hellström
<gunnar.hellst...@omnitor.se> wrote:
My conclusions are:
1. The feature will be allowed. ( deduced from your answer that Kev is asked
do do an update )
2. How edits are presented to the receiving user is out of scope, but a
recommendation to make it clearly displayed that there was an edit will be
included.
3. Edit any previous will be included. It is up to the transmitter to use it
or not. Receivers should be prepared to act on editing any previous.
I have updated 308 in Git. I believe I've addressed all feedback other
than allowing editing of any previous - for this I've made a note that
the protocol can be used as such, but that signalling is out of scope
and so 308 without further negotiation is only for the last message.
That is fine. I fully respect your decision and am glad that XEP-0308
will be rescued from deferred state.
/Gunnar
