Just a thought: How would that rule apply to Messages without a body but with extensions (e.g. in M2M-communication)?
Regards Johannes -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: standards-boun...@xmpp.org [mailto:standards-boun...@xmpp.org] Im Auftrag von Matthew Wild Gesendet: Donnerstag, 20. Juni 2013 22:10 An: XMPP Standards Betreff: Re: [Standards] Proposed XMPP Extension: Chat Markers On 20 June 2013 09:23, Spencer MacDonald <spencer.macdonald.ot...@gmail.com> wrote: > I would personally be happy with either solution, but if we keep the > no body rule for backwards compatibility, wouldn't we require > "positive" message processing hints too, for when we want to archive a > message with no body? > i.e. allow-permanent-storage, allow-storage, allow-copy Yes, if we kept the rule then I would add such hints. However as I noted in my message, I think I'd rather remove it. And there isn't really anything to keep backwards compatibility with. Regards, Matthew
