-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

The proposed text looks fine to me.

On 9/22/13 11:09 AM, Mark Rejhon wrote:
> Re: http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0301.html Solution to MUC
> discovery.
> 
> Further discussions were made between key people off-list quickly
> try and address the groupchat (MUC) discovery issue.  This added
> slight more text to also cover the server-side of things, too, see
> below. I'll create a new XEP-0301 update after I receive comments
> from m&m that were mentioned to be sent shortly.
> 
> Note: We have a conference presentation about XEP-0301 at ACM
> ACCESS '13 in mid-October
> 
> 
> _____________________________________________
> 
> CHANGE #1: _____________________________________________
> 
> 5.1 Support for Groupchat
> 
> Real-time text MAY also be used with &xep0045; (XEP-0045). Before 
> transmitting <rtt/> elements to a groupchat room, clients MUST
> follow section 17.1.1 of XEP-0045 to verify that the service allows
> any extension or that ‘urn:xmpp:rtt:0’ is listed as an allowable
> namespace.
> 
> Services explicitly allowing this extension MUST follow section
> 17.1.1 of XEP-0045 to include ‘urn:xmpp:rtt:0’ as an allowable
> namespace.
> 
> See [[[Usage with Multi-User Chat]]].
> 
> 
> _____________________________________________
> 
> CHANGE #2: (section 7.5.4) 
> _____________________________________________
> 
> 7.5.4 Usage with Multi-User Chat
> 
> For simplicity, clients can implement real-time text only for
> one-to-one chat, and not for XEP-0045 Multi-User-Chat. However, it
> can be appropriate to support <rtt/> elements in groupchat rooms,
> even if not all participants support real-time text, as long as the
> service allows it (See [[[Support for Groupchat]]]).
> 
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=fn0D
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to