On 26 Jan 2015, at 13:14, Piotr Nosek <piotr.no...@erlang-solutions.com> wrote: > I can't think of a way to definitely solve this right now but is it such a > frequent case that you will send tons of messages to someone without a single > answer and then reconnect repeatedly?
It illustrates that you often need to do a sync that overwrites bits of the local archive, though. I’d really like a more robust solution than that. I’m hoping we’ll get there at the summit. > Anyway I think it is essential to have some ID assigned by server (at least) > in MAM. Even if clients would add proper IDs to the stanzas, the server might > prefer an optimized ID types to enhance archive lookups, like a guarantee for > them to be non-decreasing. Yes, the server has to be assigning UIDs for the messages as part of MAM as it stands. /K
