Seconded.

On 1 April 2015 at 13:37, Dave Cridland <d...@cridland.net> wrote:

> Folks,
>
> Matthew Miller and Joe Hildebrand's Carbons XEP has been unchanged for 18
> months, and represents a useful and well-deployed protocol, implemented in
> most (if not all) of the mainstream servers.
>
> Mobile and Desktop clients alike appear to implement this widely.
>
> I appreciate that the last Summit raised suggestions that it needed to do
> more, but it is not clear to me that the "more" cannot be phrased as a new
> XEP, and moreover that breaking compatibility given the deployment status
> is warranted.
>
> It is also not clear to me what, exactly, the "more" consists of. I have
> heard:
>
>  - Reflection of messages to the source.
>  - Addition of MAM identifiers.
>  - Other types beyond 'chat'.
>
> Therefore I would like to suggest that this specification be advanced to
> match its de-facto state of Draft.
>
> Dave.
>

Reply via email to