Hey Kevin, On 28 May 2015 at 08:48, Kevin Smith <kevin.sm...@isode.com> wrote:
> On 28 May 2015, at 13:36, Ben Langfeld <b...@langfeld.me> wrote: > > Did the Rayo spec get an advancement decision since votes on-list from > the last meeting? > > Hi Ben. > > Yes, I’ve put a -1 on it pending further discussion. I started doing a > once-over before voting, and had a few things I’d like to discuss - but > after spending a few hours on it I got distracted by other things and > didn’t finish the review. It’s near the top of my todo to finish it and > send the points to standards@ for discussion. Fantastic. I look forward to your comments and figuring out how we can address those and at what point in the evolution of the spec those make sense. I'd like to point out that we managed to reach something of a consensus at the end of the Last Call, and I'd love to keep that momentum for version 1 if we can, and address any non-critical suggestions in a later version of the specification, given the late stage of the feedback. > > /K > > > > > On 28 May 2015 at 06:11, Kevin Smith <kevin.sm...@isode.com> wrote: > > FYI > > > > > Begin forwarded message: > > > > > > From: Kevin Smith > > > Subject: [Council] Minutes 2015-05-27 > > > Date: 28 May 2015 11:10:24 BST > > > To: XMPP Council > > > Reply-To: XMPP Council > > > > > > Room logs: http://logs.xmpp.org/council/2015-05-27/ > > > > > > 1) Roll call > > > > > > Kev, Matt, Dave present. Lance sent apologies, Fippo absent. > > > > > > 2) Date of next meeting > > > > > > 2015-06-03 15:00Z > > > > > > 3) Any other business > > > > > > Brief discussion about whether the Editor team’s improvements to > submission/tracking handling could include tracking of Council comments on > documents. Kev will pass on to the Editor team (some of whom were present). > > > > > > Fini > > > > > >
