* Steffen Larsen <zoo...@gmail.com> [2015-05-30 08:37]: > No, I would go for a version bump, because it could break some clients.
A version bump, on the other hand, would break all clients. Some clients haven't yet implemented the sm:2 to sm:3 bump, and implementing different versions of the protocol in parallel is not always trivial. +1 for the new feature. -1 for the version bump. Georg -- || http://op-co.de ++ GCS d--(++) s: a C+++ UL+++ !P L+++ !E W+++ N ++ || gpg: 0x962FD2DE || o? K- w---() O M V? PS+ PE-- Y++ PGP+ t+ 5 R+ || || Ge0rG: euIRCnet || X(+++) tv+ b+(++) DI+++ D- G e++++ h- r++ y? || ++ IRCnet OFTC OPN ||_________________________________________________||
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
